NJ Strong Weather Forum


Join the forum, it's quick and easy

NJ Strong Weather Forum
NJ Strong Weather Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Long Range Discussion 22.0

+33
skinsfan1177
chief7
WeatherBob
emokid51783
hyde345
jmanley32
dsix85
jaydoy
billg315
lglickman1
CPcantmeasuresnow
Snow88
mmanisca
phil155
weatherwatchermom
Dunnzoo
nutleyblizzard
Radz
Irish
Wheezer
Math23x7
rb924119
SENJsnowman
heehaw453
algae888
aiannone
MattyICE
frank 638
Frank_Wx
docstox12
dkodgis
amugs
sroc4
37 posters

Page 19 of 31 Previous  1 ... 11 ... 18, 19, 20 ... 25 ... 31  Next

Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by amugs Thu Dec 30, 2021 9:04 pm

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Fh4k0810

amugs
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 15088
Join date : 2013-01-07

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by amugs Thu Dec 30, 2021 9:06 pm

Euro made a small adjustment with separation and a jog N at 18Z
Brooklyn 33nRain Map

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Ezgif.com-gif-maker.gif.0d36c51c172e8465c76b7e849ec97511

amugs
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 15088
Join date : 2013-01-07

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by amugs Thu Dec 30, 2021 9:06 pm


_________________
Mugs 
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs
amugs
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 15088
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by sroc4 Thu Dec 30, 2021 11:49 pm

And the NAM and GFS cave to the S&E. Euro will be Godzilla. Book it

_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"      
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65" 
sroc4
sroc4
Admin
Admin

Posts : 8326
Reputation : 301
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by Irish Fri Dec 31, 2021 12:06 am

sroc4 wrote:And the NAM and GFS cave to the S&E. Euro will be Godzilla. Book it

Is this an improvement or moving in the wrong direction?
Irish
Irish
Pro Enthusiast
Pro Enthusiast

Posts : 788
Reputation : 19
Join date : 2019-01-16
Age : 45
Location : Old Bridge, NJ

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by rb924119 Fri Dec 31, 2021 2:03 am

Frank_Wx wrote:The greatest threat to Monday’s storm is yet another anomalous surface low over Alaska pushing into the west coast, turning the flow progressive and disrupting the needed phase at 500mb along the east coast. For now I put chances at 10% for accumulation in Central Park, which is the highest yet this season. Hopefully we can get something to work out. If it doesn’t work out, it’s because of this dreaded -WPO regime we have been in.

Beyond Monday, the -WPO ridge is posed to move north and pinch off over the Arctic. As mentioned already by many on here, this follows a window of opportunity where we can get cross polar flow of arctic air into the central and eastern CONUS from the 5th to the 15th. In my opinion, that is the 10-day window to get something really going. Unfortunately, I’m not as optimistic as others that things turn around late January into February. The way Nina looks, and the overall makeup of the Tropospheric 500mb pattern and lack of coupling with the Stratosphere, I see another -WPO/-PNA pattern trying to take shape late Jan. Still a wayyyy long way to go before we get there. I’ll assess again in ten days or so..

Ok, Mr. Party Pooper lol

Nah, jk Frank haha I am genuinely surprised at your less than optimistic opinion, though. You mentioned some general thoughts above, but what specifically has you gunshy?

As for the Stratosphere, there’s a lag of 3-6 weeks generally between changes in itself and Troposphere, regardless of whether those changes are propagating top-down or bottom-up. So, this why I’ve said that the forcing mechanisms are going to oscillate between the MJO (which is what will be the catalyst for the main pattern change in about 7-10 days), and then the Stratospheric evolution, which is only going to be headed in a favorable direction NOW. However, these changes should continue for several weeks (as long as the MJO has been in Phases 6 and 7, we should see the Stratospheric disruption continue). So, we’ve been in Phases 6-7 for at least a month, therefore, the Stratospheric PV should remain favorably disturbed and oriented for about that long (so, essentially most of the month of January). Carry the lag, and you’re looking good from the end of January through at least Week 3 of February with respect only to the Stratospheric PV, assuming the Stratospheric PV disruption subsides after the effects of the MJO pulse moved on, which, may not be the case thanks to the -QBO piling on. That would only extend the fun if it did lol after that, I expect the MJO to take over again in generally cold phases (as we’ve already discussed).

rb924119
Meteorologist
Meteorologist

Posts : 6887
Reputation : 194
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by rb924119 Fri Dec 31, 2021 2:06 am

Irish wrote:
sroc4 wrote:And the NAM and GFS cave to the S&E. Euro will be Godzilla. Book it

Is this an improvement or moving in the wrong direction?

The NAM and GFS went the wrong way, and Im pretty sure he was being sarcastic about the EURO and having a bit of fun with all of the model chaos that we’ve seen in the short-term in recent seasons haha

The EURO, btw, was a miss wide-right as well, if you were wondering.

Fear thee not, though. I am about a micron away from completely going all-in for the period from January 13th-16th for a BIG one Wink I just want time to really reassess the situation before making the official decision haha but, just know that there is a massive storm signal showing up for that period, in my opinion. I’ll probably do a video discussion on it if I feel it’s warranted and a legitimate threat.

rb924119
Meteorologist
Meteorologist

Posts : 6887
Reputation : 194
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa

heehaw453 and Irish like this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by amugs Fri Dec 31, 2021 8:10 am

W Things for Mon storm.
1. Need the NS Storm 500 mb level to run higher up n out of CAN not into SE where it will squash the storm.
IF IT DOES lift further North then the storm has sometime as heights rise a bit more ahead of the storm and it can lift further N. The window on this is tight but it is possible.
2. We are seeing separation between theb2 systems and virus which is allowing this to make some adjustments/ticks N.
We'll see what the 12z runs at 500mb level have. May not see great surface depiction at onset but still on the table.

Lastly, I look at the maps and see lots of influences on the PV from MJO to SCAN Ridge, earlier in Dec to EAMT to QBO Easterly winds. This latent heat and water vapor from these main first three mentioned I believe will have an affect on the PV to being elongated.
A good look overall. Now I know exactly what some my Debbie down about wah wah and turn that frown upside down.....no NAO everything will cut......think again 2013/2014, 14-15 are 2 examples. You have the Triplets (SNOW, CP, DOC) showing up -EPO/+PNA/-AO but look at where the NATL blocking feature is is here. That PV drops down as indicated with the arrow and that block gets pulled west. Even if it doesn't we still have chances for snow.
GEFs Mean 500 from Jan 6-15th compliments of SMTS on 33nrain
Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 1944833420_10day500s.gif.e7989212b4662baa4989af7577667e9e

_________________
Mugs 
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs
amugs
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 15088
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by heehaw453 Fri Dec 31, 2021 8:24 am

I am getting more optimistic on 1/7 window.  Several facets that intrigue me 1/Injection of cold air, 2/much better PNA, 3/climatology, 4/better model agreement

00Z EPS notice the banana high signature of the surface pressure anomaly and the western ridging allowing the ULL to slide and amplify.  May not pan out, but this look might be most legit snow chance so far this season. GEFS is similar look with just a hair better ridging.

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Eps110
Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Eps210

heehaw453
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 3901
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by amugs Fri Dec 31, 2021 10:11 am

Rb here's your Hovmoller and GEFS BC MJO wave which coincides with the chart.

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Hovmoller.gif.7e2899a4f33b428fe87da588626fb6ca

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Diagram_40days_forecast_GEFSBC_member
It is a slow wave as to be expected in a Nina year(s).
The plots keep correcting as they have done since Dec with teh wave spending more time in teh correct phase than projected forecasted. This again is what happens in a Nina year which we are in. Now with that said i would surmise that this should continue by this past data and the wave should continue through phase 8for a longer period of time. Could it eventually wind up in the COD - middle circle in the MJO chart absolutely but from what we've seen this winter the models forecasting have been to quick to move these waves into the 10 day projections. This coincides beautifully with a phase 7 8 for the 1st week later of January to kick things off.







_________________
Mugs 
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs
amugs
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 15088
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by heehaw453 Fri Dec 31, 2021 11:11 am

12Z GFS for Sunday night/Monday leaves just enough interest for coastal folks.  At the H5 it looks good to me.  ULL would need to be another 100-150 miles north and then our forum coastal areas would be getting significant snows. Make no mistake though whoever is in the sweet spot on this will be getting significant snow with that look.  Right now Delmarva up to Dover DE looks to be in cross hairs.  Good for me them as they've been shafted many a year.
Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Gfs40

heehaw453
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 3901
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL

rb924119 and SENJsnowman like this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by heehaw453 Fri Dec 31, 2021 11:51 am

SENJsnowman and sroc4 very close here.  Got to see how this thing trends.  Any northward trend and damn...

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Gem11

heehaw453
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 3901
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by MattyICE Fri Dec 31, 2021 12:07 pm

heehaw453 wrote:SENJsnowman and sroc4 very close here.  Got to see how this thing trends.  Any northward trend and damn...

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Gem11

Agree! We also have to keep an eye on the jet streak as we get into short range model range. If we can get it more favorably oriented then we could end up with a SLP in a less than optimum position for snow further north, but a more expansive precip shield to the NW.

MattyICE
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 249
Reputation : 6
Join date : 2017-11-10
Age : 38
Location : Clifton, NJ (Eastern Passaic County)

rb924119 and heehaw453 like this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by sroc4 Fri Dec 31, 2021 12:38 pm

MattyICE wrote:
heehaw453 wrote:SENJsnowman and sroc4 very close here.  Got to see how this thing trends.  Any northward trend and damn...

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Gem11

Agree!  We also have to keep an eye on the jet streak as we get into short range model range. If we can get it more favorably oriented then we could end up with a SLP in a less than optimum position for snow further north, but a more expansive precip shield to the NW.

Totally to you both. Take a look at the H5 changes and surface changes to track on the CMC as well. It has been very progressive, and S&E until now. It scrapes the area now. Still 3 days. Im getting slammed at work today so I cant delve deeper, but a shift of 50miles N and areas like mine can see a nice little event. Id take 1-3" and move on in a heart beat

_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"      
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65" 
sroc4
sroc4
Admin
Admin

Posts : 8326
Reputation : 301
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI

rb924119 and MattyICE like this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by heehaw453 Fri Dec 31, 2021 12:50 pm

MattyICE wrote:
heehaw453 wrote:SENJsnowman and sroc4 very close here.  Got to see how this thing trends.  Any northward trend and damn...

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Gem11

Agree!  We also have to keep an eye on the jet streak as we get into short range model range. If we can get it more favorably oriented then we could end up with a SLP in a less than optimum position for snow further north, but a more expansive precip shield to the NW.

Absolutely. If the 500mb trough can swing a bit negative before clearing the coast then the mid-level energy will be able to bring lift up to I-95, albeit light. Models are now showing that possibility and that is why you see the snow creeping northward. But ULL is still too far south and most importantly the flow is overall progressive. If you had something to buckle the flow then you'd be talking about major snowfall up the eastern seaboard. The way I see this playing out it is a scraping on eastern most areas and senjsnowman's hood is probably in the best spot to see accumulation out of this. Cape May would be even better spot.

heehaw453
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 3901
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by amugs Fri Dec 31, 2021 1:44 pm

The Northern Energy not in a good sampling region of the NW. I think a 100 mile shift NW is possible. Confluence over NE needs to ease and pull N.

_________________
Mugs 
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs
amugs
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 15088
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by MattyICE Fri Dec 31, 2021 2:14 pm

amugs wrote:The Northern Energy not in a good sampling region of the NW. I think a 100 mile shift NW is possible. Confluence over NE needs to ease and pull N.

True Mugs. I haven’t taken a close look
At the confluence. BUT easing it out COULD happen as we see the blocking in the NAO domain ease back toward neutral

MattyICE
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 249
Reputation : 6
Join date : 2017-11-10
Age : 38
Location : Clifton, NJ (Eastern Passaic County)

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by rb924119 Fri Dec 31, 2021 5:28 pm

amugs wrote:W Things for Mon storm.
1. Need the NS Storm 500 mb level to run higher up n out of CAN not into SE where it will squash the storm.
IF IT DOES lift further North then the storm has sometime as heights rise a bit more ahead of the storm and it can lift further N. The window on this is tight but it is possible.
2. We are seeing separation between theb2 systems and virus which is allowing this to make some adjustments/ticks N.
We'll see what the 12z runs at 500mb level have. May not see great surface depiction at onset but still on the table.

Lastly, I look at the maps and see lots of influences on the PV from MJO to SCAN Ridge, earlier in Dec to EAMT to QBO Easterly winds. This latent heat and water vapor from these main first three mentioned I believe will have an affect on the PV to being elongated.
A good look overall. Now I know exactly what some my Debbie down about wah wah and turn that frown upside down.....no NAO everything will cut......think again 2013/2014, 14-15 are 2 examples. You have the Triplets (SNOW, CP, DOC) showing up -EPO/+PNA/-AO but look at where the NATL blocking feature is is here. That PV drops down as indicated with the arrow and that block gets pulled west. Even if it doesn't we still have chances for snow.
GEFs Mean 500 from Jan 6-15th compliments of SMTS on 33nrain
Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 1944833420_10day500s.gif.e7989212b4662baa4989af7577667e9e

Great post, mugsy! That signature over Western Europe/Northeastern Atlantic is what I also think will evolve into a renewed -NAO signature down the road. Nice job highlighting that!

rb924119
Meteorologist
Meteorologist

Posts : 6887
Reputation : 194
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by rb924119 Fri Dec 31, 2021 5:35 pm

amugs wrote:Rb here's your Hovmoller and GEFS BC MJO wave which coincides with the chart.

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Hovmoller.gif.7e2899a4f33b428fe87da588626fb6ca

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Diagram_40days_forecast_GEFSBC_member
It is a slow wave as to be expected in a Nina year(s).
The plots keep correcting as they have done since Dec with teh wave spending more time in teh correct phase than projected forecasted. This again is what happens in a Nina year which we are in. Now with that said i would surmise that this should continue by this past data and the wave should continue through phase 8for a longer period of time. Could it eventually wind up in the COD - middle circle in the MJO chart absolutely but from what we've seen this winter the models forecasting have been to quick to move these waves into the 10 day projections. This coincides beautifully with a phase 7 8 for the 1st week later of January to kick things off.

I agree with this, and is why I like the CFS progression better overall than either the GEFS or EPS. I think we continue to see further corrections to less time in on Phase 7, and longer and stronger in Phases 8 and 1 before declining as it goes through Phase 2 into 3. We know where I think it goes after that haha

rb924119
Meteorologist
Meteorologist

Posts : 6887
Reputation : 194
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa

amugs likes this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by rb924119 Fri Dec 31, 2021 5:39 pm

Reel in Monday’s threat Scott, heehaw, mugsy and Marty!! I probably won’t be able to sit down and check it out in any depth, but if I can find some time, I’ll try to at least see if I can get on the gimble belt with you fellas!

rb924119
Meteorologist
Meteorologist

Posts : 6887
Reputation : 194
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa

MattyICE likes this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by heehaw453 Fri Dec 31, 2021 6:01 pm

RB wonderful stuff as always. If you get a chance let us know your thoughts on 1/7. I could see the SE ridge hanging tough and then there is a storm that tries to lift north or right over us. I'm just noticing a classic banana high setup with this and I think it'll force a baroclinic zone to our south on which a wave forms. I think there is just enough PNA ridging to give a crack at something moderate.

heehaw453
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 3901
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by amugs Fri Dec 31, 2021 7:10 pm

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 986547699_gfs_z500_vort_us_fh54_trend(1).gif.781dafdd1e4ee881992ba627a4651154

The confluence over NE is waning and it is allowing a NW tick - we need another 75 miles and it is doable since it moved about that much since 6Z a few more adjustments adn we may see a nice little snow for CNJ and S along with LI. NNJ would get snow but light.

_________________
Mugs 
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs
amugs
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 15088
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by amugs Fri Dec 31, 2021 8:52 pm

Rb hacked this tweet LOL!


_________________
Mugs 
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs
amugs
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 15088
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ

rb924119 and Irish like this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by rb924119 Sat Jan 01, 2022 12:19 am

I’ve been waiting for a run like this……


Merry New Year from the GFS:

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 8f2c0e10

Mugs and I have been adamant on a NESIS event in the January Week 2 to Week 3 period. I said the 13th-16th looks to have BIG potential. While I’m not officially endorsing this period YET, this run is how I would draw up a HECS/Frankzilla.

Damian, I think it’s you waiting for that elusive HECS. Well, the GFS just delivered the most beautiful run I’ve ever seen at H5. Forget the surface maps verbatim, because this would challenge records if it actually played out this way. Forget the Holy Trinity, because this is the Holy Pentad.

Good night all Smile

rb924119
Meteorologist
Meteorologist

Posts : 6887
Reputation : 194
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa

amugs, Grselig, jmanley32, SENJsnowman, Irish, jaydoy, phil155 and Bwtr like this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by jaydoy Sat Jan 01, 2022 1:25 am

I don’t post here a lot, but these last few weeks I have placed my trust in rb, probably longer, let’s see some of that cold and white gold

jaydoy

Posts : 23
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2019-01-23

rb924119 and phil155 like this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by rb924119 Sat Jan 01, 2022 8:19 am

jaydoy wrote:I don’t post here a lot, but these last few weeks I have placed my trust in rb, probably longer, let’s see some of that cold and white gold

Thanks, Jay!! Trying my best to deliver the goods! Haha

rb924119
Meteorologist
Meteorologist

Posts : 6887
Reputation : 194
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by rb924119 Sat Jan 01, 2022 8:23 am

LOCK. IT. IN.

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 0ef1cf10
Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 42a8a410
Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 86fae410

rb924119
Meteorologist
Meteorologist

Posts : 6887
Reputation : 194
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa

heehaw453 and MattyICE like this post

Back to top Go down

Long Range Discussion 22.0 - Page 19 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 22.0

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 19 of 31 Previous  1 ... 11 ... 18, 19, 20 ... 25 ... 31  Next

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum