Official Long Range Thread 2.0
+40
nofoboater
Aiosamoney21
Nick Panico
Yschiff
Sparky Sparticles
petep10
aiannone
crippo84
Noreaster
2004blackwrx
Sanchize06
devsman
Grselig
pdubz
jtswife
jbnyy224
essexcountypete
mako460
skinsfan1177
Dunnzoo
Artechmetals
SoulSingMG
jmanley32
sabamfa
HectorO
shabsies
oldtimer
algae888
Quietace
CPcantmeasuresnow
Radz
Math23x7
SNOW MAN
NjWeatherGuy
nutleyblizzard
amugs
Frank_Wx
RJB8525
docstox12
sroc4
44 posters
Page 6 of 41
Page 6 of 41 • 1 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 23 ... 41
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
Wasn't sure where to post it but I noted a storm going off the coast around 144-168HRS (I hate how it jumps 24 hrs so you can't see exactly how it goes, on the free sites anyways) which is right around the time of the storm we lost last week for 1-2nd, does anyone have a snowfall output for the 00z Euro? And as I said on the other thread kudos to frank for calling that something would come back around today or tomorrow. This winter ain't done yet boys! Oh and yes I understand still alot can change, 6 days out so I know not to get too excited, just a observation, that was intriguing.
jmanley32- Senior Enthusiast
- Posts : 20512
Join date : 2013-12-12
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
My bad it appears to be the 3rd storm calculated my hrs wrong lol, anyways GFS looks to have two storms in a row but there seems to be alot of you know what on the maps which kinda sux.
jmanley32- Senior Enthusiast
- Posts : 20512
Join date : 2013-12-12
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
Past couple GFS runs show a snow to ice to rain scenario.
NjWeatherGuy- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 4100
Reputation : 28
Join date : 2013-01-06
Location : Belle Mead, NJ
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
Hey NJ, 12z GFS shows what could be a major ice storm for coastal and just inaland areas (like myself) for 3rd timeframe, a bit concerning but still to far out. Here is latest image I got so far on GFS. Looks like some snow first.
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2014022512/gfs_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_23.png
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2014022512/gfs_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_23.png
jmanley32- Senior Enthusiast
- Posts : 20512
Reputation : 108
Join date : 2013-12-12
Age : 42
Location : Yonkers, NY
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
TWC has been flip flopping yesterdaey they had plain snow for Monday now Today they have rain for Mon. abc7 keeps talking about the possible coastal storm for the past few days
RJB8525- Senior Enthusiast
- Posts : 1994
Reputation : 28
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 38
Location : Hackettstown, NJ
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
12z GFS shows a snow to frz to snow event, not good. But plenty of time to change.
jmanley32- Senior Enthusiast
- Posts : 20512
Reputation : 108
Join date : 2013-12-12
Age : 42
Location : Yonkers, NY
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
Jmanley your right, I posted that before the storm finished on the run, thought for sure it was gonna cut but confluence shunted it due east, looks like a lot of precip, will look into it more when I get home
NjWeatherGuy- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 4100
Reputation : 28
Join date : 2013-01-06
Location : Belle Mead, NJ
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
From what I can see from the models on my phone its an inch or snow to zr or ip everyone NW of 95 to 3-5" of snow at end, long duration ice storm, I dont think any of us want to see this verify
NjWeatherGuy- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 4100
Reputation : 28
Join date : 2013-01-06
Location : Belle Mead, NJ
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
12z gfs has a weaker low and is further s/e than 00z. 00z gfs and euro ensembles are s/e of OP run. what concerns me about todays runs and the last several storms is that they have trended weaker and less qpf as we get closer to the event.
algae888- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 5311
Reputation : 46
Join date : 2013-02-05
Age : 61
Location : mt. vernon, new york
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
A thing to note is it appears timing has shifted into a Sunday afternoon into Monday kind of idea. Good news for my Tuesday flight if its true.
NjWeatherGuy- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 4100
Reputation : 28
Join date : 2013-01-06
Location : Belle Mead, NJ
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
The storm early next week HAS to be watched closely. We could be in a scenario where long-duration light to moderate snow falls due to strong energy to our south and a strong HP to our north. Right along the gradient, snow could break out. Overrunning snow for hours according to the 12z GGEM
_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
12z GGEM shows at least 8+ inches of snow probably 12+
_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
Snow from Monday to Wednesday on the GGEM with 12+ inches of snow. Wow
_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
How about coastal areas frank
skinsfan1177- Senior Enthusiast
- Posts : 4485
Reputation : 35
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 46
Location : Point Pleasant Boro
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
The thing that concerns me is that this setup typically doesn't spell big snow in the I-95 corridor, any of the past storms you can see usually leads to WWA invading most of the area prompting a changeover to a mix or plain rain in areas. That's not to say it wont happen but at 120 hours out it's a perilous setup and I can see it trending north. That in mind I am still interested it just proceed with caution. I'll be more comfortable in a solution by Friday and even then there's at least a day for wiggle room.
NjWeatherGuy- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 4100
Reputation : 28
Join date : 2013-01-06
Location : Belle Mead, NJ
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
Frank_Wx wrote:
2 feet plus IMBY? I hate these maps especially this far out, because when the storm doesn't produce amounts anywhere near this or trends to ice or rain people will be disappointed.
NjWeatherGuy- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 4100
Reputation : 28
Join date : 2013-01-06
Location : Belle Mead, NJ
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
E-Wall View of CMC.
http://mp1.met.psu.edu/~fxg1/CMC_12z/cmcloop.html
I don't need to tell Frank this but people viewing, please do not take it verbatim. It will change a lot. Just one solution in a jar of about 50 right now, as the days go on we will be able to take more and more solutions out of that jar but as of now, it's just potential.
http://mp1.met.psu.edu/~fxg1/CMC_12z/cmcloop.html
I don't need to tell Frank this but people viewing, please do not take it verbatim. It will change a lot. Just one solution in a jar of about 50 right now, as the days go on we will be able to take more and more solutions out of that jar but as of now, it's just potential.
NjWeatherGuy- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 4100
Reputation : 28
Join date : 2013-01-06
Location : Belle Mead, NJ
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
Here is CMC maps if you want to see - I will watch carefully like Frank said and want to see this solution come to fruition Friday and Saturday - this will change many times between now and then especially trying to get the position of the PV which is KEY for us with this storm. MJO in phase 8 (going to phase 1?) STJ is ramping up and Mr. PV is sitting to our North with the -EPO and PNA (is it going neg, neutral or staying in a 2+ state?
Next week things get very interesting not only the first part but the later part as well IMO.
http://meteocentre.com/models/gemglb_amer_12/P6_GZ_D5_PN_144_0000.gif
http://meteocentre.com/models/gemglb_amer_12/P6_GZ_D5_PN_156_0000.gif
" />
Next week things get very interesting not only the first part but the later part as well IMO.
http://meteocentre.com/models/gemglb_amer_12/P6_GZ_D5_PN_144_0000.gif
http://meteocentre.com/models/gemglb_amer_12/P6_GZ_D5_PN_156_0000.gif
" />
Last edited by amugs on Tue Feb 25, 2014 1:54 pm; edited 1 time in total
_________________
Mugs
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs- Advanced Forecaster - Mod
- Posts : 15091
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
NjWeatherGuy wrote:E-Wall View of CMC.
http://mp1.met.psu.edu/~fxg1/CMC_12z/cmcloop.html
I don't need to tell Frank this but people viewing, please do not take it verbatim. It will change a lot. Just one solution in a jar of about 50 right now, as the days go on we will be able to take more and more solutions out of that jar but as of now, it's just potential.
The first person to look at this map and say, wow we have a chance to get over 2 feet, thereby ruining any chances for this to ever happen, should be suspended from the board for 1 week. IMO
Yes I'm kidding, sort of.
CPcantmeasuresnow- Wx Statistician Guru
- Posts : 7274
Reputation : 230
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 103
Location : Eastern Orange County, NY
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
WOW ! We have a chance at getting two feet of snow ! LOL !
SNOW MAN- Senior Enthusiast
- Posts : 1361
Reputation : 25
Join date : 2013-01-13
Age : 64
Location : Marshalls Creek Pa.
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
You're banned, SNOWMAN!!!!!!!! LOL.
mako460- Pro Enthusiast
- Posts : 346
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2013-01-09
Age : 57
Location : Gerritsen Beach Brooklyn
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
CPcantmeasuresnow wrote:NjWeatherGuy wrote:E-Wall View of CMC.
http://mp1.met.psu.edu/~fxg1/CMC_12z/cmcloop.html
I don't need to tell Frank this but people viewing, please do not take it verbatim. It will change a lot. Just one solution in a jar of about 50 right now, as the days go on we will be able to take more and more solutions out of that jar but as of now, it's just potential.
The first person to look at this map and say, wow we have a chance to get over 2 feet, thereby ruining any chances for this to ever happen, should be suspended from the board for 1 week. IMO
Yes I'm kidding, sort of.
Yea, we're already seeing the IMBY questions, not going to name names. Again, people, ignore clown maps or P-types or anything, look at the upper level pattern and low pressure track trends over the past few days. DO NOT WORRY ABOUT P-TYPE, AMOUNTS, QPF OR ANYTHING ELSE. Just look for trends ATM.
NjWeatherGuy- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 4100
Reputation : 28
Join date : 2013-01-06
Location : Belle Mead, NJ
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
SNOW MAN wrote:WOW ! We have a chance at getting two feet of snow ! LOL !
Excellent Snowman.
CPcantmeasuresnow- Wx Statistician Guru
- Posts : 7274
Reputation : 230
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 103
Location : Eastern Orange County, NY
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
Well I guess I'm banned now, so I'm taking my snowball and I'm going home.
SNOW MAN- Senior Enthusiast
- Posts : 1361
Reputation : 25
Join date : 2013-01-13
Age : 64
Location : Marshalls Creek Pa.
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
From a poster on another forum, sums up my thoughts perfectly
There could be many arguments at this point running for and against a more suppressed solution... at this stage we simply don't have enough information to determine which will verify, especially with the key players way out in no-data land. Using model trend-based arguments, it could be said that this will be more suppressed due to the models recently overestimating the strength of shortwaves and trending weaker/suppressed in the shorter range, along with stronger confluence than modeled, while it could also be argued that a more amplified solution would verify given the upper level SW-flow with the PV/baroclinic zone retreating northward, and also taking into consideration that the model guidance was in pretty good agreement of a major I-95 snowstorm for 2/5 nearly a week out before trending north and warmer.
Realistically, we don't have enough information to make a solid call at this stage. The whole purpose of forecasting though is not to simply say "we don't know so why bother speculating" or "models are useless, why should we even use them", which could be considered the equivalent of giving up. At this point I have high confidence in precipitation falling in parts of the region, snow included due to the antecedent air mass, but I can't say much more than that with confidence; my early thinking based on the upper level flow and robust southern stream would be towards a further north track than the 12z GFS/CMC, but as with every other forecast it could change quite a bit this far out.
There could be many arguments at this point running for and against a more suppressed solution... at this stage we simply don't have enough information to determine which will verify, especially with the key players way out in no-data land. Using model trend-based arguments, it could be said that this will be more suppressed due to the models recently overestimating the strength of shortwaves and trending weaker/suppressed in the shorter range, along with stronger confluence than modeled, while it could also be argued that a more amplified solution would verify given the upper level SW-flow with the PV/baroclinic zone retreating northward, and also taking into consideration that the model guidance was in pretty good agreement of a major I-95 snowstorm for 2/5 nearly a week out before trending north and warmer.
Realistically, we don't have enough information to make a solid call at this stage. The whole purpose of forecasting though is not to simply say "we don't know so why bother speculating" or "models are useless, why should we even use them", which could be considered the equivalent of giving up. At this point I have high confidence in precipitation falling in parts of the region, snow included due to the antecedent air mass, but I can't say much more than that with confidence; my early thinking based on the upper level flow and robust southern stream would be towards a further north track than the 12z GFS/CMC, but as with every other forecast it could change quite a bit this far out.
NjWeatherGuy- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 4100
Reputation : 28
Join date : 2013-01-06
Location : Belle Mead, NJ
Re: Official Long Range Thread 2.0
Later Next Week - would be nice if it verified but toooooo far out- IMAGINE if they both verified as per the CMC - 2 MECS - bookend storms - they would crush the March snowfall records for some if not all! We can only wish, hope and pray!
_________________
Mugs
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs- Advanced Forecaster - Mod
- Posts : 15091
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ
Page 6 of 41 • 1 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 23 ... 41
Page 6 of 41
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|