Tracking Another Possible Godzilla Mon-Tues, March 12th-13th

amugs wrote:Here we go DOC!!

SREFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh is the 32 line the cut off? I know sometimes its the 0 line. Doc would yet again benefit verbatim here and coast gets shafter, or am I wrong? Not hugging the model just trying to read it.

docstox12 wrote:

amugs wrote:Rb thanks kid for your expert input.
It's coming!!
GEFS BABY

Bring that baby home Mugsy!!!! Let's go out of this winter with a big blast!!!! Let's get the shore, Island, and Al and J man 20 inches plus too!!!

"Let's go out of this winter a big blast!!!!" he says......little does he know the Euro Weeklies rock us through into April!!!!! This pattern flip of 4-6 weeks of time-mean troughing, storminess, and below-average temperatures was delayed by two weeks over most forecasts. Had the pattern change occurred on time, we would have been coming out of this regime toward the end of March. Since it was displaced two weeks, the pronostication of the Weeklies makes sense against the long-standing forecasts from back in JANUARY for this period of time-mean troughing, storminess, and below-average temperatures in the East. I think this is why recently we have seen the modeling begin reloading our blocking pattern also. I think this could turn out to be a true and classic case of "delayed, not denied" for those of us who issued those long-range outlooks buckle up, because we will very likely continue to have chances at these types of systems and this type of pattern, folks!!!

rb your really getting me psyched up.

SNOW MAN wrote:rb your really getting me psyched up.

Just calling it how I see it, Snowman haha good to have you back, boss!!! Idk where you have been, but it's nice to see you posting again!!!

MY GOD THE SREFS!!!!!! Hopefully they maintain this look through the remainder of their 80+ hours of runs until game time, but DEAR LORD THEY LOOK EPIC RIGHT NOW!!!! Ahahaha

rb how much snow did your parents get at their home in PA. ?

7.6" this time, but they had well over 20" with the Friday system haha with the extra inch we have picked up today, our snowpack is a solid 18" lmao I love it up here!!!

@crankyweatherboy not buying into this at all. He said it’s flat and doesn’t see anything big. What’s he up to? Does anyone agree?

rb924119 wrote:7.6" this time, but they had well over 20" with the Friday system haha with the extra inch we have picked up today, our snowpack is a solid 18" lmao I love it up here!!!

Not bad. Lets hope we can add a lot before the end of the season. Did they have any power outages up that way ? I just got mine back on Tuesday night and got my cable/internet today. The worst thing about living in this area is when the power goes out you have no water because your using a well not city water.

SNOW MAN wrote:

rb924119 wrote:7.6" this time, but they had well over 20" with the Friday system haha with the extra inch we have picked up today, our snowpack is a solid 18" lmao I love it up here!!!

Not bad. Lets hope we can add a lot before the end of the season. Did they have any power outages up that way ? I just got mine back on Tuesday night and got my cable/internet today. The worst thing about living in this area is when the power goes out you have no water because your using a well not city water.

AMEN BROTHA!!!! And that's when they got theirs back haha they were out since the storm as well. Yeah, it is inconvenient, but between the generator and snow they were fine either way. If the generator had decided to crap out, they had snow that could have been melted with the woodstove, which is how we heat our whole house. We've been there, done that before so we aren't strangers to living without power ahah it's inconvenient, but far from crippling lmao I love country living!!!

jake732 wrote:@crankyweatherboy not buying into this at all. He said it’s flat and doesn’t see anything big. What’s he up to? Does anyone agree?

I have no idea what he sees or is saying, so I cannot comment aside from saying that I disagree with what he said per your paraphrasing haha

rb924119 wrote:

jake732 wrote:@crankyweatherboy not buying into this at all. He said it’s flat and doesn’t see anything big. What’s he up to? Does anyone agree?

I have no idea what he sees or is saying, so I cannot comment aside from saying that I disagree with what he said per your paraphrasing haha

How much snow was the sref rb verbatim?

Still out of range, but if extrapolated there would have been a lot of QPF haha

rb924119 wrote:Still out of range, but if extrapolated there would have been a lot of QPF haha

okay i wont probe further lol

0Z NAM is south.....

Math23x7 wrote:
0Z NAM is south.....

ya quite a bit frpm 18z, its ok, its not in good range yet.

Math23x7 wrote:
0Z NAM is south.....

BUT it definitely made strides toward the GFS aloft, which is good.

0z GFS looks like it might be heading toward a good run

Sanchize06 wrote:0z GFS looks like it might be heading toward a good run

Hybrid Miller A?

GFS BABAYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!! WOOOOOO WOOOOOO WOOOOO WOOOOO WOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!! MY ANALYSIS HOLDS WATER RIGHT NOW LETS GOOOOOOOOOO BOYS AND GIRLS!!!!!!

COASTAL CRUSHER!!!!!!! ALMOST A TRIPLE PHASE IN TIME FOR US TO REALLY GET BLASTED JUNO STYLE!!!!!

SOOOOOOOOOO close to that elusive triple. Like WOW close.

Well looks like GFS is still on board. In fact I got nervous at one point the low would be TOO close to the coast (that issue again. Lol). Still too early for those types of details. Bottom line, it’s two good runs in a row this better than last.

Radz wrote:

Sanchize06 wrote:0z GFS looks like it might be heading toward a good run

Hybrid Miller A?

Yeah, somewhere between Miller A and B lol

billg315 wrote:Well looks like GFS is still on board. In fact I got nervous at one point the low would be TOO close to the coast (that issue again. Lol). Still too early for those types of details. Bottom line, it’s two good runs in a row this better than last.

Hope we get some support from the rest of the 0z suite

0z CMC much further west, still OTS, light snow for the coast, but big improvement it looks like