March 14th Godzilla Discussion Part 2

Regular NAM

track17 wrote:Ugh this sucks from what i am hearing after jakes coast comment i guess we are looking at like 1-2 inches

I'm trying to post maps and provide people valuable information. If you want to complain, go to the banter thread. For the record, this run verbatim gives you over 10 inches of snow. Please relax.

I am just reacting to jakes comment so please day the same to him and not single out

track17 wrote:I am just reacting to jakes comment so please day the same to him and not single out

Very tue. Jake and Track please refrain from complaining in this thread esp as we are trying to post the play by play. Keep it in banter. Thanks

Not a problem thank you sroc

Mother of God and madonne! I stay all snow and very close if not in heaviest bands wow we may get our roid after all but Jim who is b awesome is right 12 to 18 is still stellar but a roidzilla would make books. Very good start to 12z.

It looks like the regular NAM developed an area of subsidence between eastern PA and NJ. Or it just got its act together late. PARA NAM is an all out Roidzilla for most.

But what I'll say is duration is long on the NAM and not a fast mover like it was before. Likely caved to the EURO at H5.

Snow map frank sorry to rush u if I am lol excited. Im.allowed b at this juncture right?

I don't have NAM para snow map but Reg NAM is not impressive. It will be very interesting to see if the Euro holds serve with its dynamics. Because NAM has consistently been under impressive, relatively speaking, with its totals.

Frank_Wx wrote:But what I'll say is duration is long on the NAM and not a fast mover like it was before. Likely caved to the EURO at H5.

I noticed that in ur plsy by play that's so awesome to hear so pumped.

Reg nam snow map

sroc4 wrote:I don't have NAM para snow map but Reg NAM is not impressive.  It will be very interesting to see if the Euro holds serve with its dynamics.  Because NAM has consistently been under impressive, relatively speaking, with its totals.  

wth what's with the split in the middle that's sad. Para nam has b better.

sroc4 wrote:I don't have NAM para snow map but Reg NAM is not impressive.  It will be very interesting to see if the Euro holds serve with its dynamics.  Because NAM has consistently been under impressive, relatively speaking, with its totals.  

There's a CCB over central PA taking away precip from the coast. Is there any other model that shows a CCB over central PA at the moment?

I hope that reg nam.is dead wrong most don't squeeze out a foot st tells me st went wrong there.

Hires NAM is amazing

Frank_Wx wrote:But what I'll say is duration is long on the NAM and not a fast mover like it was before. Likely caved to the EURO at H5.

Frank it could very well be the new data that was ingested this morning with the drop sondes up in Canada showing higher heights. Will be interested to see if the other models start to pick up on it.

Frank_Wx wrote:

sroc4 wrote:I don't have NAM para snow map but Reg NAM is not impressive.  It will be very interesting to see if the Euro holds serve with its dynamics.  Because NAM has consistently been under impressive, relatively speaking, with its totals.  

There's a CCB over central PA taking away precip from the coast. Is there any other model that shows a CCB over central PA at the moment?

I looked at all the model runs and I don't think there is. Also is para snow map better? That model been better snyways.

Wwwooowww

Frank_Wx wrote:Wwwooowww

woo 4 to 5 inch rates Imby amoung others wowzers. This is what we want can't wait see this snow map!

Like Frank said looks like an area of subsidence develops at 850mb

sroc4 wrote:Like Frank said looks like an area of subsidence develops at 850mb

not a model lol only hires from here on out positive juju as mugs wpuld say