Long Range Discussion 23.0
+45
mikeypizano
bobjohnsonforthehall
Dunnzoo
Scullybutcher
Math23x7
adamfitz1969
Joe Snow
Koroptim
dkodgis
Grselig
bloc1357
Carvin
chief7
essexcountypete
lisalamb
dolphins222
aiannone
emokid51783
hurrysundown23
docstox12
algae888
SoulSingMG
Snow88
Irish
CPcantmeasuresnow
frank 638
weatherwatchermom
dsix85
nutleyblizzard
crippo84
Zhukov1945
Ronfdny
MattyICE
mmanisca
sroc4
jmanley32
richb521
SENJsnowman
lglickman1
phil155
amugs
heehaw453
Radz
rb924119
Frank_Wx
49 posters
Page 13 of 26
Page 13 of 26 • 1 ... 8 ... 12, 13, 14 ... 19 ... 26
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
nutleyblizzard wrote:6z RGEM would of been a bit hit if extrapolated out. It moves out the energy in the SW faster compared to the 0z run. It’ll be interesting to see if the CMC responds today and shifts west at 12z.
Yes, RGEM also in the EURO camp.
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
The EURO has been made available for FREE
https://twitter.com/ecmwf/status/1485935823694532608?s=21
https://twitter.com/ecmwf/status/1485935823694532608?s=21
_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
jmanley32 likes this post
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
Frank_Wx wrote:It is extremely concerning that we’re still seeing the GFS, NAM and in part the CMC hold energy back. It’s mostly concerning because it’s a trend we have seen this season. The EURO is completely on its own, and if you remember also did a poor job forecasting last weekends storm. With an anomalous EPO and PNA ridge I would expect these upper air features to advance east as normal. But the ridge is seemingly trying to overtop our southern piece. I still don’t think that is right, and we saw more GEF members at 06z trend west compared to 00z. However, would love to see the GFS progress this energy east at 12z today. If it can, it GREATLY increases odds for a Godzilla this weekend.
It's quite common for phasing scenarios to not be resolved at this range. This phase is about 72 hours out. We've seen Boxing Day within 36 hours dramatically change phasing outcomes as well as Juno which was damn near game time. Phasing is way too complex to have any confidence this far out. That said I'm not saying this is going to work out and an OTS solution is absolutely on the table as well as direct hit. My point is I trust both the Euro/GFS equally at this point as well as their ensembles and that is not much until there is consensus and run/run consistency.
heehaw453- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 3906
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65"
sroc4- Admin
- Posts : 8331
Reputation : 301
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI
SoulSingMG likes this post
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65"
sroc4- Admin
- Posts : 8331
Reputation : 301
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
heehaw453- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 3906
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL
sroc4 likes this post
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
Hahaha, Scott, this is too funny of a coincidence not to mention.
I JUST posted this in one of our FOX Weather slack channels (note the very first line) -- only to come here and see your artwork!
While the two heavy-weights of forecast models continue to duke it out, the NWS New York & NWS Boston are working in tandem. Pretty rare to see two forecast offices use the exact same verbiage in their Hazardous Weather Outlooks. Shows how wide-reaching & impactful this nor'easter has the potential to be...
SoulSingMG- Senior Enthusiast
- Posts : 2853
Reputation : 74
Join date : 2013-12-11
Location : Long Island City, NY
sroc4 likes this post
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
SoulSingMG wrote:
Hahaha, Scott, this is too funny of a coincidence not to mention.
I JUST posted this in one of our FOX Weather slack channels (note the very first line) -- only to come here and see your artwork!
While the two heavy-weights of forecast models continue to duke it out, the NWS New York & NWS Boston are working in tandem. Pretty rare to see two forecast offices use the exact same verbiage in their Hazardous Weather Outlooks. Shows how wide-reaching & impactful this nor'easter has the potential to be...
Lol. Great minds Soul.
_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65"
sroc4- Admin
- Posts : 8331
Reputation : 301
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI
SoulSingMG likes this post
nutleyblizzard- Senior Enthusiast
- Posts : 1952
Reputation : 41
Join date : 2014-01-30
Age : 58
Location : Nutley, new jersey
heehaw453- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 3906
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL
heehaw453- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 3906
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
I agree 100% with you on this Frank. At least here on Long Island it seems as though all the models are hinting at a snow event.Frank_Wx wrote:It is extremely concerning that we’re still seeing the GFS, NAM and in part the CMC hold energy back. It’s mostly concerning because it’s a trend we have seen this season. The EURO is completely on its own, and if you remember also did a poor job forecasting last weekends storm. With an anomalous EPO and PNA ridge I would expect these upper air features to advance east as normal. But the ridge is seemingly trying to overtop our southern piece. I still don’t think that is right, and we saw more GEF members at 06z trend west compared to 00z. However, would love to see the GFS progress this energy east at 12z today. If it can, it GREATLY increases odds for a Godzilla this weekend.
mmanisca- Pro Enthusiast
- Posts : 298
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 65
Location : Deer Park, Long Island
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
wow thats pretty clear consensus amoung the ensembles compared to the GEFS, I really hope the Eyuro is right, and remember this will probably do the NW SE thing at least once or twice or does the GFS win out, I hope not but like sroc im walking on eggshells. 12z should be interesting but even if it does not show any changes it is stil lfar out for proper sampling of the phasing as hehaw and others have stated.
jmanley32- Senior Enthusiast
- Posts : 20513
Reputation : 108
Join date : 2013-12-12
Age : 42
Location : Yonkers, NY
SENJsnowman likes this post
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
jmanley32 wrote:wow thats pretty clear consensus amoung the ensembles compared to the GEFS, I really hope the Eyuro is right, and remember this will probably do the NW SE thing at least once or twice or does the GFS win out, I hope not but like sroc im walking on eggshells. 12z should be interesting but even if it does not show any changes it is stil lfar out for proper sampling of the phasing as hehaw and others have stated.
JMan it's a majority of the 51 members are some aspect of phasing, but there's still enough which don't. So Euro IMO ain't quite there yet. Again IMO. You are right though each run now does get more important but I won't be surprised to see GFS not budge until 00Z tonight or even tomorrow if this is truly going to happen.
heehaw453- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 3906
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
Yeah I know, just trying to keep hope alive, don't want anyone jumping off a building, we should make a thread for therapy with jman lol. Though snow obsession would be the first time I have treated that.heehaw453 wrote:jmanley32 wrote:wow thats pretty clear consensus amoung the ensembles compared to the GEFS, I really hope the Eyuro is right, and remember this will probably do the NW SE thing at least once or twice or does the GFS win out, I hope not but like sroc im walking on eggshells. 12z should be interesting but even if it does not show any changes it is stil lfar out for proper sampling of the phasing as hehaw and others have stated.
JMan it's a majority of the 51 members are some aspect of phasing, but there's still enough which don't. So Euro IMO ain't quite there yet. Again IMO. You are right though each run now does get more important but I won't be surprised to see GFS not budge until 00Z tonight or even tomorrow if this is truly going to happen.
jmanley32- Senior Enthusiast
- Posts : 20513
Reputation : 108
Join date : 2013-12-12
Age : 42
Location : Yonkers, NY
phil155 likes this post
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
Does not appear the 12z NAM will eject the southern energy.
Man...
Man...
_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
Quick question are we saying still can get storm but maybe not as strong I’m kinda lost on the weather talk
Carvin- Posts : 44
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2019-01-09
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
We having fun yet?
Great discussion and not much form my camp other than as pointed out the energy is so far in la la land that we won't know until at best 0Z Wednesday.
I asked a few mets about this - Drag, McKim, Halzer that I know about why the energy is being held back. Variety of answers but a consensus is what am looking for in general.
NAM makes a nod to the Euro - tick tock tick tock At 54 much better but not quite there.
Ride the Euro control been steadfast on its solution without wavering LOL!! Its also the snowiest.
busy day not much to add today as well.
Great discussion and not much form my camp other than as pointed out the energy is so far in la la land that we won't know until at best 0Z Wednesday.
I asked a few mets about this - Drag, McKim, Halzer that I know about why the energy is being held back. Variety of answers but a consensus is what am looking for in general.
NAM makes a nod to the Euro - tick tock tick tock At 54 much better but not quite there.
Ride the Euro control been steadfast on its solution without wavering LOL!! Its also the snowiest.
busy day not much to add today as well.
_________________
Mugs
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs- Advanced Forecaster - Mod
- Posts : 15093
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
Well, it did TREND toward trying to eject the southern energy faster compared to 06z
_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
mmanisca likes this post
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
Carvin wrote:Quick question are we saying still can get storm but maybe not as strong I’m kinda lost on the weather talk
It is either a strong storm that impacts the coast or no storm at all. I don't think there will be an 'in between' solution. All or nothing.
_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
We want that SW energy to be where at that time frame? It def comes at least a few hundred miles east but I presume we need a lot more than that, how much stock do you put in LR NAM? Normally I thought you do not really buy into the NAM at this range.Frank_Wx wrote:Well, it did TREND toward trying to eject the southern energy faster compared to 06z
jmanley32- Senior Enthusiast
- Posts : 20513
Reputation : 108
Join date : 2013-12-12
Age : 42
Location : Yonkers, NY
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
Frank_Wx wrote:Carvin wrote:Quick question are we saying still can get storm but maybe not as strong I’m kinda lost on the weather talk
It is either a strong storm that impacts the coast or no storm at all. I don't think there will be an 'in between' solution. All or nothing.
Im going to respectfully disagree with this statement. I think because the ridge is still robust, even if less than ideal for a complete phase and crippling euro type soln doesnt happen, there is still an opportunity for a partial phase and eastern sections still eeking out a minor to mod event.
_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65"
sroc4- Admin
- Posts : 8331
Reputation : 301
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
sroc4 wrote:Frank_Wx wrote:Carvin wrote:Quick question are we saying still can get storm but maybe not as strong I’m kinda lost on the weather talk
It is either a strong storm that impacts the coast or no storm at all. I don't think there will be an 'in between' solution. All or nothing.
Im going to respectfully disagree with this statement. I think the ridge, even if less than ideal for a complete phase and crippling euro type soln doesnt happen, there is still an opportunity for a partial phase and eastern sections still eeking out a minor to mod event.
I agree with this. Especially if the 500mb trough tilt can go negative before it hits the coast. The models will often underdo how far back the precip field goes. Also, IMO regardless of the setup the nirvana solutions are special for a reason. They don't come cheap and they are like unicorns. Until you see locked and loaded consensus with 36 hours you have to know there is always a way out.
heehaw453- Advanced Forecaster
- Posts : 3906
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
jmanley32 wrote:We want that SW energy to be where at that time frame? It def comes at least a few hundred miles east but I presume we need a lot more than that, how much stock do you put in LR NAM? Normally I thought you do not really buy into the NAM at this range.Frank_Wx wrote:Well, it did TREND toward trying to eject the southern energy faster compared to 06z
Well southern s/w is coming into the NAM's range (48ish hours), so I was hoping it would not hold it back. Ideally, I would have liked to see it over NM during that time and into Texas by 12z Friday.
sroc4 wrote:Frank_Wx wrote:Carvin wrote:Quick question are we saying still can get storm but maybe not as strong I’m kinda lost on the weather talk
It is either a strong storm that impacts the coast or no storm at all. I don't think there will be an 'in between' solution. All or nothing.
Im going to respectfully disagree with this statement. I think because the ridge is still robust, even if less than ideal for a complete phase and crippling euro type soln doesnt happen, there is still an opportunity for a partial phase and eastern sections still eeking out a minor to mod event.
Possibly. I don't see 'partial' energy ejecting out of the SW. I think it all goes or none of it at all. We shall see
_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
Is there a sense of why the SW energy was being ejected on yesterday's runs but not on the overnight or this morning's runs?
lglickman1- Pro Enthusiast
- Posts : 319
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-02-05
Location : New Rochelle, NY
Re: Long Range Discussion 23.0
lglickman1 wrote:Is there a sense of why the SW energy was being ejected on yesterday's runs but not on the overnight or this morning's runs?
Eh, GFS had one or two runs where it did eject but its always been slower in doing so. I just think there are two model camps as Scott joked about. GFS vs EURO
_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
Page 13 of 26 • 1 ... 8 ... 12, 13, 14 ... 19 ... 26
Page 13 of 26
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|