NJ Strong Weather Forum


Join the forum, it's quick and easy

NJ Strong Weather Forum
NJ Strong Weather Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

+43
toople
TheAresian
Koroptim
Bkdude
essexcountypete
chief7
GreyBeard
crippo84
hyde345
lglickman1
Zhukov1945
bloc1357
SENJsnowman
Snow88
CPcantmeasuresnow
bobjohnsonforthehall
weatherwatchermom
skinsfan1177
billg315
SoulSingMG
phil155
aiannone
nutleyblizzard
Math23x7
Wheezer
Irish
Frank_Wx
mwilli
Grselig
Isotherm
heehaw453
jimv45
frank 638
docstox12
rb924119
sroc4
HectorO
algae888
dkodgis
Radz
jmanley32
amugs
Dunnzoo
47 posters

Page 21 of 30 Previous  1 ... 12 ... 20, 21, 22 ... 25 ... 30  Next

Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by sroc4 Sat Jan 09, 2021 8:30 am

crippo84 wrote:
jmanley32 wrote:
sroc4 wrote:
heehaw453 wrote:This is just too close to something for me to lose hope completely for the 12th.  You have lot of energy at that trough on the EUS and a northern piece not too far off.  Timing is everything and if that northern piece were to drop into that it's a powder keg.  

12Z CMC

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Cmc14

100%  Def not letting it go just yet.  There is still waaay too much model to model variability with all the prev highlighted energy, as well as run to run variability within any given model.  The energy I prev labeled as #1 and #2 only begins to come ashore tonight into tomorrow am respectively.  Ill give this one until we are within about 72hrs.  give or take.  Chances still favore the miss to the south however so make sure everyone keeps expectations in check, but dont turn away just yet.  

WE TRACK!!!!  What a Face
I am confused, this is 3 days out, wouldn't we have a good idea by now if somethere were go happen? I have not yet seen a surface run that gives us a big hit except maybe a post few pages back, is there something different about this particular possible event that makes it still interesting with no hit only 72 hrs out?

Have you read all the posts about all the different pieces of energy in the atmosphere and why with the pattern we're entering any solution may not be known until a couple days in advance?

Thank You Crippo. And Jon I’ll add that I didn’t write that this am. I highlighted a key piece of the write up for you. Come on Dude.

For the record I’m still not writing it off just yet.

sroc4
Admin
Admin

Posts : 8331
Join date : 2013-01-07

Grselig likes this post

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by jmanley32 Sat Jan 09, 2021 10:33 am

sroc4 wrote:
crippo84 wrote:
jmanley32 wrote:
sroc4 wrote:
heehaw453 wrote:This is just too close to something for me to lose hope completely for the 12th.  You have lot of energy at that trough on the EUS and a northern piece not too far off.  Timing is everything and if that northern piece were to drop into that it's a powder keg.  

12Z CMC

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Cmc14

100%  Def not letting it go just yet.  There is still waaay too much model to model variability with all the prev highlighted energy, as well as run to run variability within any given model.  The energy I prev labeled as #1 and #2 only begins to come ashore tonight into tomorrow am respectively.  Ill give this one until we are within about 72hrs.  give or take.  Chances still favore the miss to the south however so make sure everyone keeps expectations in check, but dont turn away just yet.  

WE TRACK!!!!  What a Face
I am confused, this is 3 days out, wouldn't we have a good idea by now if somethere were go happen? I have not yet seen a surface run that gives us a big hit except maybe a post few pages back, is there something different about this particular possible event that makes it still interesting with no hit only 72 hrs out?

Have you read all the posts about all the different pieces of energy in the atmosphere and why with the pattern we're entering any solution may not be known until a couple days in advance?

Thank You Crippo. And Jon I’ll add that I didn’t write that this am. I highlighted a key piece of the write up for you. Come on Dude.

For the record I’m still not writing it off just yet.
I been super busy so no not much time to read in depth but yeah I did see the many pieces but that seems abnormal by 3 days out usually we have a pretty darn good idea of whats go happen, so only time I can think of that we did not know to throw in towel or not was before I was on here I think was boxing Day blizzard, had no idea it had done a 180 and night b4 suddenly major storm. On the alternate side we had no idea the storm that must not be named gamve me almost no snow which everyone to the east got buried. So I guess I can see how there could be a surprise but if there is a storm no one including DOT will be prepared as news says sunny and nice.

jmanley32
Senior Enthusiast
Senior Enthusiast

Posts : 20513
Join date : 2013-12-12

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by Frank_Wx Sat Jan 09, 2021 5:18 pm

I’ve seen enough to remove the snow threat on the 12th from the SCI. Unfortunately, the Pacific jet extension is killing our flow.

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Gfs_uv250_namer_17

Next time frame to watch: 16th-20th

It’s going to be pretty dry for awhile...

_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
Frank_Wx
Frank_Wx
Godzilla Seeker
Godzilla Seeker

Posts : 21305
Reputation : 328
Join date : 2013-01-05
Age : 31
Location : Jersey City, NJ

http://njstrongweather.blogspot.com/

phil155 likes this post

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by phil155 Sat Jan 09, 2021 8:43 pm

☹

phil155
Pro Enthusiast
Pro Enthusiast

Posts : 475
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2019-12-16

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by Frank_Wx Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:12 am

Ouch...

We are going to lose blocking late month into February if this comes true. There is one PNA spike around the 19th. Brutal cold will also ensue through the 25th or so. That is likely our window (19th-25th).

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 6b499610


Although PNA goes negative on the GEFS, you’re still getting a source of cold from the Arctic as the EPO also goes negative. If the NAO is still negative at this time then our chances for northern stream based storms are still on the table.

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 32e74e10

_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
Frank_Wx
Frank_Wx
Godzilla Seeker
Godzilla Seeker

Posts : 21305
Reputation : 328
Join date : 2013-01-05
Age : 31
Location : Jersey City, NJ

http://njstrongweather.blogspot.com/

rb924119, weatherwatchermom and Sanz01 like this post

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by GreyBeard Sun Jan 10, 2021 1:46 pm

Not very encouraging, Frank. A lot of "ifs" in your forecast. Seems like the general consensus is that we have about a 5-6 day window at the end of  the month as per rb, isotherm, and Frank.

Always hear about blocking. We need blocking, there is no blocking etc. Now we have blocking, but it isn't doing anything positive. I know there is more to it than that, just frustrating.

GreyBeard
Senior Enthusiast
Senior Enthusiast

Posts : 725
Reputation : 34
Join date : 2014-02-12
Location : eastern nassau county

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by Dunnzoo Sun Jan 10, 2021 7:39 pm

Going back to the fall, a lot of long range forecasters predicted a back-ended winter, that we had to wait until late January/February to get the goods. I guess they were on to something.

_________________
Janet

Snowfall winter of 2023-2024  17.5"    

Snowfall winter of 2022-2023       6.0"
Snowfall winter of 2021-2022     17.6"    1" sleet 2/25/22
Snowfall winter of 2020-2021     51.1"
Snowfall winter of 2019-2020       8.5"
Snowfall winter of 2018-2019     25.1"
Snowfall winter of 2017-2018     51.9"
Snowfall winter of 2016-2017     45.6"
Snowfall winter of 2015-2016     29.5"
Snowfall winter of 2014-2015     50.55"
Snowfall winter of 2013-2014     66.5"
Dunnzoo
Dunnzoo
Senior Enthusiast - Mod
Senior Enthusiast - Mod

Posts : 4887
Reputation : 68
Join date : 2013-01-11
Age : 62
Location : Westwood, NJ

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by amugs Mon Jan 11, 2021 1:17 pm



Makes great sense. We could start to see models show clippers coming through next week. Need weekend energy to dig a bit to get some widespread snow.

_________________
Mugs 
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs
amugs
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 15093
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by Frank_Wx Mon Jan 11, 2021 1:57 pm

I actually disagree with his characterization of the pattern. The -NAO is not in a suppressive state. It is actually conducive for east coast snowstorms. The underwhelming cold air mass has to do with the +EPO flooding the country with mild Pacific air, and also with the stratospheric warming that took place sending the SPV to the other side of the globe. If the SPV split, it would have sent a PV lobe into the lower latitudes of the Trop which would have resulted in extremely cold air entering the CONUS.

He is correct in saying a switch from +EPO to -EPO will enable a cross-polar flow to drive colder air into the east coast. By that point, I'm not so sure we'll have an active STJ like we do not but the polar jet may be favorable for clipper-like storms to affect us.

_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
Frank_Wx
Frank_Wx
Godzilla Seeker
Godzilla Seeker

Posts : 21305
Reputation : 328
Join date : 2013-01-05
Age : 31
Location : Jersey City, NJ

http://njstrongweather.blogspot.com/

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by heehaw453 Mon Jan 11, 2021 4:08 pm

Frank_Wx wrote:I actually disagree with his characterization of the pattern. The -NAO is not in a suppressive state. It is actually conducive for east coast snowstorms. The underwhelming cold air mass has to do with the +EPO flooding the country with mild Pacific air, and also with the stratospheric warming that took place sending the SPV to the other side of the globe. If the SPV split, it would have sent a PV lobe into the lower latitudes of the Trop which would have resulted in extremely cold air entering the CONUS.

He is correct in saying a switch from +EPO to -EPO will enable a cross-polar flow to drive colder air into the east coast. By that point, I'm not so sure we'll have an active STJ like we do not but the polar jet may be favorable for clipper-like storms to affect us.

I agree with this. The PAC air caused by the +EPO air has caused many potential inches of snow to wiped off the table so far. But, even some northern stream only stuff as it gets colder (e.g., clippers) can blow up to something much bigger with the -NAO that tends to block the flow. Based on what I'm seeing now though it doesn't scream of big storm potential for the foreseeable future. I think just getting some snow OTG that sticks around would be a huge win. There's really no confidence ATTM on next time it snows around here.

heehaw453
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 3906
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL

rb924119 likes this post

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by amugs Mon Jan 11, 2021 7:57 pm

Here is what we are waiting for Nice PNA/EPO couplet = cross polar flow (or is it an arctic?) with a Negative NAO West Block - the models will start to sniff this out so be patient and have hope n faith which I know not many have in these last few winters
2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 EreWS-ZUYAEO-WO?format=jpg&name=medium

_________________
Mugs 
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs
amugs
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 15093
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ

Frank_Wx likes this post

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by Frank_Wx Mon Jan 11, 2021 9:32 pm

amugs wrote:Here is what we are waiting for Nice PNA/EPO couplet = cross polar flow (or is it an arctic?) with a Negative NAO West Block - the models will start to sniff this out so be patient and have hope n faith which I know not many have in these last few winters
2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 EreWS-ZUYAEO-WO?format=jpg&name=medium

Verbatim, this is a fantastic pattern. It is not perfect, I would like to see a more poleward Pac ridge, but we do not need perfection in the middle of January to see it snow.

I stand by what I wrote in the scroll. The extreme high latitude blocking pattern is giving models a very difficult time. The background state of the future pattern (-EPO/-NAO) is conducive for snow. We have to be really patient and hope one of the hundred short waves coming out of the Pacific works in our favor. If we exit this pattern without seeing an inch of snow, I will shut this forum down I tell you!!!

January 18th-30th represents slightly above average snow potential
January 22nd-27th represents above average snow potential

_________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

CLICK HERE to view NJ Strong Snowstorm Classifications
Frank_Wx
Frank_Wx
Godzilla Seeker
Godzilla Seeker

Posts : 21305
Reputation : 328
Join date : 2013-01-05
Age : 31
Location : Jersey City, NJ

http://njstrongweather.blogspot.com/

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by billg315 Tue Jan 12, 2021 4:41 pm

Not sure what folks on here think of Joe Bastardi, but in his weekend update this week he was still very bullish on a cold and very active pattern for the Eastern U.S. starting sometime next week through early to mid-Feb. I'm keeping my fingers crossed, because while the Dec. 16 storm was nice, if that's the highlight of the winter it wasn't enough for me.

p.s. he also was very bullish on the possibility of an unusually snowy pattern in the United Kingdom for the UK members on this Forum.
billg315
billg315
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 4462
Reputation : 185
Join date : 2015-01-24
Age : 50
Location : Flemington, NJ

Grselig and brownie like this post

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by mwilli Tue Jan 12, 2021 6:33 pm

besides getting my feet wet by watching twc in 92 I got to learn a few things from Bastardi some of his predictions (1/6/96 blizzard in n.y)were right on point so if he predict this keep a side eye on this

mwilli

Posts : 132
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2019-02-11

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by dkodgis Tue Jan 12, 2021 8:46 pm

I’ll give it to Joe. I think he called the 2013-14 and 14-15 winters and early at that. I remember thinking he was off track then he was right. Two very cold winters.
dkodgis
dkodgis
Senior Enthusiast
Senior Enthusiast

Posts : 2494
Reputation : 98
Join date : 2013-12-29

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by amugs Wed Jan 13, 2021 10:40 am

It coming folks and teh ENS are picking up on it, it will evolve.
As Frank has stated after mid month things may get jiggy and possibly extreme for some regions of the US. Even Rb said after Jan 20th he sees more implications of possibly wintry events.
The potential storms that I outlined -(2/3, 12,16,23) were squashed or shredded by the NAO and the PAC JET.
Lots of winter left and we have had many winters where we did not get started until mid to late Jan. Patience here as always.
JB has made some great calls in his day and missed on some as well but that the fun of predicting especially weather. He is a very intelligent meteorologist - read both his books.
Just a bit to far N!
Here the 16/17th storm - could be an appy for our Northern Posters
2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Image.png.a24c3fe7876919dfc4ce5bcc9ef0789e

_________________
Mugs 
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs
amugs
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 15093
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by heehaw453 Wed Jan 13, 2021 2:19 pm

Some guidance including today's 12Z Euro shows a threat around 1/21.  SWFE kind of deal with a nice baroclinic zone to our south.  IMO with the blocking occurring that is a more plausible way to get some decent snow here without help from the PAC.  A weaker wave riding along the baroclinic zone can produce here quite nicely.

I'd really like to see some good faith snow from the -AO/-NAO fairly soon.


Last edited by heehaw453 on Wed Jan 13, 2021 2:27 pm; edited 1 time in total

heehaw453
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 3906
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by amugs Wed Jan 13, 2021 2:22 pm

This is a Cross Polar Flow for sure
2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 EroXQP_XcAYQ17a?format=png&name=medium

_________________
Mugs 
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs
amugs
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 15093
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by sroc4 Wed Jan 13, 2021 2:40 pm

heehaw453 wrote:Some guidance including today's 12Z Euro shows a threat around 1/21.  SWFE kind of deal with a nice baroclinic zone to our south.  IMO with the blocking occurring that is a more plausible way to get some decent snow here without help from the PAC.  A weaker wave riding along the baroclinic zone can produce here quite nicely.

I'd really like to see some good faith snow from the -AO/-NAO fairly soon.

Def looks all nice.   HP to the noprth in great position as it approaches.  Very cold air mass in place.   Surface temps in upper 20's low 30's with dewpoints in mid twenties.  Mid levels -3 to -6*c.  Id say verbatim its probably a 12-15:1 ratio to whatever QPF fell.  With likely baroclinic enhancements to the totals models tend to miss.  

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Maybe10


BUUUTTTT its 7-8 days out so......


2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 200

We'll keep an eye on it. Im not trying to be a jerk. Just frustrated...me want snow!

_________________
"In weather and in life, there's no winning and losing; there's only winning and learning."
WINTER 2012/2013 TOTALS 43.65"WINTER 2017/2018 TOTALS 62.85" WINTER 2022/2023 TOTALS 4.9"      
WINTER 2013/2014 TOTALS 64.85"WINTER 2018/2019 TOTALS 14.25" WINTER 2023/2024 TOTALS 13.1"
WINTER 2014/2015 TOTALS 71.20"WINTER 2019/2020 TOTALS 6.35"
WINTER 2015/2016 TOTALS 35.00"WINTER 2020/2021 TOTALS 37.75"
WINTER 2016/2017 TOTALS 42.25"WINTER 2021/2022 TOTALS 31.65" 
sroc4
sroc4
Admin
Admin

Posts : 8331
Reputation : 301
Join date : 2013-01-07
Location : Wading River, LI

crippo84 likes this post

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by rb924119 Wed Jan 13, 2021 3:48 pm

amugs wrote:It coming folks and teh ENS are picking up on it, it will evolve.
As Frank has stated after mid month things may get jiggy and possibly extreme for some regions of the US. Even Rb said after Jan 20th he sees more implications of possibly wintry events.
The potential storms that I outlined -(2/3, 12,16,23) were squashed or shredded by the NAO and the PAC JET.
Lots of winter left and we have had many winters where we did not get started until mid to late Jan. Patience here as always.
JB has made some great calls in his day and missed on some as well but that the fun of predicting especially weather. He is a very intelligent meteorologist - read both his books.
Just a bit to far N!
Here the 16/17th storm - could be an appy for our Northern Posters
2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Image.png.a24c3fe7876919dfc4ce5bcc9ef0789e

No offense, mugsy, but I never said that haha I said the 14th-16th threat would be the best chance at getting snow to the coast before we began to see an increasingly hostile pattern evolve (or the “better” pattern devolve, though I argued that it wasn’t really that much better, and that even the 14th-16th threat would most likely favor the interior (I-81 Corridor)) for coastal snow. My lack of posting should indicate that my feelings remain generally unchanged lol

rb924119
Meteorologist
Meteorologist

Posts : 6889
Reputation : 194
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 32
Location : Greentown, Pa

chief7 likes this post

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by chief7 Wed Jan 13, 2021 8:24 pm

In all fairness Rob did say the pattern will get better roughly the 20th on Hopefully I’m not overstepping my boundaries Rob And he did make this comment roughly 2 to about 2 1/2 weeks ago

chief7

Posts : 132
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-11-10
Location : Langhorne pa

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by heehaw453 Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:05 pm

Obviously at 7 days out lots can change but guidance is consistent on bringing the moisture far enough north. Not really seeing this getting suppressed based on what I've been seeing. The air will probably be plenty of cold at all levels to support snow at least to start.

A weak wave riding the baroclinic zone will give us best chance to stay snow and produce a moderate to possibly significant event.

An amplified storm will run the risk of further west track which will put us at risk for frozen other than snow. However, there still may be light/moderate front end snow in that scenario.

The upshot is there is a threat next week. Do not underestimate the -NAO in this scenario as well. Models often underappreciate its effects.

heehaw453
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 3906
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2014-01-20
Location : Bedminster Township, PA Elevation 600' ASL

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by billg315 Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:16 pm

heehaw453 wrote:Obviously at 7 days out lots can change but guidance is consistent on bringing the moisture far enough north.  Not really seeing this getting suppressed based on what I've been seeing.  The air will probably be plenty of cold at all levels to support snow at least to start.  

A weak wave riding the baroclinic zone will give us best chance to stay snow and produce a moderate to possibly significant event.  

An amplified storm will run the risk of further west track which will put us at risk for frozen other than snow.  However, there still may be light/moderate front end snow in that scenario.

The upshot is there is a threat next week.  Do not underestimate the -NAO in this scenario as well.  Models often underappreciate its effects.

GFS seems to favor a couple opportunities for the setup you describe, one around the 23rd and another around the 26th. Still a ways out but I think it could at a minimum be hinting that this is the type of pattern that will set up once this colder air settles in middle of next week. We do often get locked into a certain storm track/pattern this time of year so it would make sense if we had a few opportunities for these types of waves in the coming weeks. I do get concerned with these that it's tightrope walk: too much cold air and we get suppression while the folks in Maryland and the Delmarva enjoy their snow, not enough cold air and we get a changeover to slop.
billg315
billg315
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 4462
Reputation : 185
Join date : 2015-01-24
Age : 50
Location : Flemington, NJ

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by amugs Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:25 pm




_________________
Mugs 
AKA:King: Snow Weenie
Self Proclaimed
WINTER 2014-15 : 55.12" +.02 for 6 coatings (avg. 35")
WINTER 2015-16 Total - 29.8" (Avg 35")
WINTER 2016-17 : 39.5" so far
amugs
amugs
Advanced Forecaster - Mod
Advanced Forecaster - Mod

Posts : 15093
Reputation : 213
Join date : 2013-01-07
Age : 54
Location : Hillsdale,NJ

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by Snow88 Thu Jan 14, 2021 7:10 pm

I am loving where this pattern is heading

Negative pna which enhances the ridge
Negative nao
Negative ao
Negative EPO which drives the cold into our area
Snow88
Snow88
Senior Enthusiast
Senior Enthusiast

Posts : 2193
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2013-01-09
Age : 35
Location : Brooklyn, NY

amugs likes this post

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by mwilli Thu Jan 14, 2021 10:24 pm

after reading the above by the 1/22 period if we get a major snowstorm someone will say madonne and I'll sound the alarm

mwilli

Posts : 132
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2019-02-11

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by algae888 Fri Jan 15, 2021 5:50 am

The block is so strong in the EPO ridge is so far West All the energy is digging into the deep South West and when it ejects out it's getting sheared apart By the very fast Pacific jet/northern stream. What horrendous runs by the models last night. A once in a decade negative NAO And we can't Get Any system to come close to us. We are probably going to have to wait until the nao relaxes a bit To get any kind of amplified system near us
algae888
algae888
Advanced Forecaster
Advanced Forecaster

Posts : 5311
Reputation : 46
Join date : 2013-02-05
Age : 61
Location : mt. vernon, new york

Back to top Go down

2 - Long Range Discussion 20(20)  (Ha!) - Page 21 Empty Re: Long Range Discussion 20(20) (Ha!)

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 21 of 30 Previous  1 ... 12 ... 20, 21, 22 ... 25 ... 30  Next

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum